iP:
tP:
This activity is worth 2x2=4
participation points.
iP Peer Evaluation 1
) that you will be using to submit your evaluation and take note of the things you need to evaluate.cd smoke-test/ip1
)java -version
command to confirm you are using Java 17.java -jar "{file_name}"
command (rather than double-clicking) in the same terminal.iP Peer Evaluation 2
).Things to note:
COMMON MISTAKE: Not following the convention for Git commit message subject.
Caution: This is very hard to rectify later, after the PR containing the commits have been merged. Reason: While Git allows editing past commits, doing so changes their timestamp, which affects your weekly code contribution stats (which are factored into evaluating the consistency of your coding work over the project duration).
COMMON MISTAKE: Not following the required phrasing style for the first sentence of Java method header comments.
COMMON MISTAKE: Forgetting to do each PR from a separate branch (i.e., send PR from the master
branch) of your fork. This error means your PR will not be considered as following the forking workflow correctly.
You may code from any of the below to be used in your tP, provided you give credit to the source (and do not claim such code as yours).
Start implementing v1.0, by adding code in small steps, while working in parallel, aiming to produce a VERY simple working version after one week, and a bit more functional version at the end of iteration (i.e., after two weeks).
See the panel below the project workflow we prescribe for the tP.
We recommend that each person adds some JUnit tests to test their tP code.
Some examples from AddressBook-Level2:
seedu.addressbook.common.Utils.java
seedu.addressbook.common.UtilsTest.java
seedu.addressbook.parser.Parser.java
seedu.addressbook.parser.ParserTest.java
parse_emptyInput_returnsIncorrect()
. Cross-check the coding standard to confirm if this naming convention is allowed.seedu.addressbook.data.AddressBook.java
seedu.addressbook.data.AddressBookTest.java